tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10760709.post115791786117689185..comments2023-10-31T10:28:50.158-04:00Comments on The Zeray Gazette: Christian Metaphysics is Best Understood Through Star TrekJohnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04854543617806427302noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10760709.post-1157972687724013672006-09-11T07:04:00.000-04:002006-09-11T07:04:00.000-04:00Yeah, I didn't see a need for the argument, either...Yeah, I didn't see a need for the argument, either. I didn't follow how divine foreknowledge and free will were logical inconsistencies.<BR/><BR/>But if they say it in Star Trek, then it <I>must</I> be true.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04854543617806427302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10760709.post-1157938695210825562006-09-10T21:38:00.000-04:002006-09-10T21:38:00.000-04:00Aarrgh. Timelessness does not answer the question....Aarrgh. <BR/><BR/>Timelessness does not answer the question. It practically begs it. <BR/><BR/>The question is who makes the effective move. The argument bounces around with prevenience and totalness being talked to death, but eventually, someone has to make the move that makes the difference. Either God gives grace to all, hoping that all will accept but being dependent upon their response, or God gives such grace to some that their decision is a foregone conclusion. <BR/><BR/>Timelessness does not not change the mechanics of the situation. Either God or man makes the effective move.Kevin Knoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16788817477327510023noreply@blogger.com