It is not necessary to prove that intellectual assertions are true or false in order to prove that they contradict each other.
For example:
1. Gavin Richardson has the UMC logo tattooed on his butt.
2. Gavin Richardson does not have the UMC logo tattooed on his butt.
I have not done any research on the subject. Nor do I plan to, or wish to hear from anyone who has. But I don't have to in order to prove that there are only two possibilities: 1 or 2.
If there is a third possibility, please inform me of it. If you cannot, then you must accept my argument as correct.
To aid in the resolution of this debate, JD e-mailed me this photo of the posterior in question:
Case closed.
5 comments:
Now if God was just as easy to prove...
PAX
JD
A pictures worth a thousand words.
I think I'll go wash out my eyes!!!
Why is it so lop-sided?
methodeist,
I think since I did find it at the tattoo parlor, maybe it was swollen from the new tattoo?
PAX
JD
Post a Comment