Jockeystreet and his wife recently purchased a TiVo. He reflected on the significance of this product:
The acquisition of this particular material convenience brought more stress than relaxation, more difficulty than ease, more anger than pleasure. The convenience of being able to record a show without using a tape, and occasionally being able to pause a live show in order to run to the kitchen for a glass of orange juice, cost us hundreds of dollars, a dozen hours, and a good deal of stress. We lost some of the conveniences we already had.
Some of this, of course, stems from the fact that neither of us has any technical know-how to speak of. A fifteen year old kid raised on iPods and laptops and plasma tvs most likely could have set the thing up in a half hour with none of the difficulties we had. But the TiVo, to me, is sort of an exaggeration of our everyday relationship to things, to acquisitions and accomplishments. It's a clear illlustration of the unhealthy way we view stuff.
Related is Daniel Gross' deliciously savage critique of Anya Kamenetz's Generation Debt.
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I like Gross' article.
"In Kamenetz's book, there are plenty of poor, self-pitying upper-middle-class types, disappointed that they can't have exactly what they want when they want it."
A couple of years ago, a woman who had recently graduated from college called into an NPR show on poverty. She stated that poverty needed to be redefined (I agree). She said that she did not fit the standard definition of poverty, but should. She had just graduated with college... and had to live with a roommate just to pay the bills! What a horror. What suffering.
The notion that every inconvenience is a great and terrible suffering never ceases to annoy me.
Post a Comment