Saturday, September 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe in a reader
Got a tip?
Email John at zeraygazette at yahoo dot com
Geekery/Pop Culture
NeatoramaTopless Robot
Great White Snark
Popped Culture
Matthew Caverhill
Johnny Cat
Blogging Buddies
Jeff the BaptistIronic Catholic
Dan Trabue
John Meunier
Divers and Sundry
Bob's Brainstorms
Jockey Street
Operation Oxmyx
Humor Links
The OnionCracked
Questionable Content
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
xkcd
Abstruse Goose
Miscellaneous
PostSecretInstapundit
Ace of Spades HQ
Hell in a Handbasket
Brian J. Noggle
4 comments:
Norman Rockwell, because his work always invokes an emotional response.
Isn't that the very definition of art?
It varies from time to time. This morning though I'm leaning towards Gustav Borghlum. Borghlum did several extremely large sculpturs Mt. Rushmore and Stone Mountain. his smaller work is also intricately done and beautiful.
My daughter, because her work is just adorable.
Also, it fits nicely on the fridge.
Rockwell's always good. At times, he's underappreciated in the fine arts community due to his subject matter. Regardless of one's opinion of his choices, his technical skill was top-tier.
I've never heard of Gustav Borghlum. I'll look into him.
Dan -- and I bet that the prices at auction can't be beat!
Post a Comment