A short and very amusing test. I failed, thankfully.
Hat tip.
Monday, December 05, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe in a reader
Got a tip?
Email John at zeraygazette at yahoo dot com
Geekery/Pop Culture
NeatoramaTopless Robot
Great White Snark
Popped Culture
Matthew Caverhill
Johnny Cat
Blogging Buddies
Jeff the BaptistIronic Catholic
Dan Trabue
John Meunier
Divers and Sundry
Bob's Brainstorms
Jockey Street
Operation Oxmyx
Humor Links
The OnionCracked
Questionable Content
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
xkcd
Abstruse Goose
Miscellaneous
PostSecretInstapundit
Ace of Spades HQ
Hell in a Handbasket
Brian J. Noggle
10 comments:
what happend to that list we worked on? some of those i really liked
I thought that you got bored of it. I'll go track it down and we'll publish.
Out of curiosity, why "Thankfully"? NOt to say that the emergent church is where I find myself all the time, just much of it, but what do you find distasteful about it?
Mind you, I doubt that one can say there is 1 "Emergent Church" any more than there is 1 "fundamentalist church" or 1 "traditional church"
Gord, I have grave concerns about emergent theology.
You should say you passed, then, John. I "failed" as I identified with more than I want to admit.
I do like coffee and drink quite a bit. I wonder if that qualifies me as emergent.
Then again, I drink house-brand coffee from the grocery store.
Anyway, even though I have worries about emergent theology, I've met a lot of really cool emergent bloggers who are dedicated Christians. By their fruit shall ye know them.
i don't know if there is an emergent theology. language or methodology, yes, theology, not so much.
that's pretty entertaining...and i did pass as emergent in the "cumulative weight" side of things--i am married, no tats and weird hair, and i haven't read much brian mclaren...but i'm down with the likes of nt wright and dallas willard.
it seems to me that a goodly number of "emergent" folk are from conservative evangelical backgrounds, but have either engaged early Church history more deeply, along with a dose of wesleyanism or have ended up as cousins on their own...
I think that I remember that test. I had a higher Fundamentalist rating than anyone else in the Methoblogosphere, except for John Wilks. Waa-hoo!
I passed (too funny)
Thanks John!
Post a Comment