Princeton researchers came up with inventive ways of stealing votes with Diebold voting machines. Here's the video (10 minutes). Scary.
Hat tip: Glenn Reynolds
Friday, September 15, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Subscribe in a reader
Got a tip?
Email John at zeraygazette at yahoo dot com
Geekery/Pop Culture
NeatoramaTopless Robot
Great White Snark
Popped Culture
Matthew Caverhill
Johnny Cat
Blogging Buddies
Jeff the BaptistIronic Catholic
Dan Trabue
John Meunier
Divers and Sundry
Bob's Brainstorms
Jockey Street
Operation Oxmyx
Humor Links
The OnionCracked
Questionable Content
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal
xkcd
Abstruse Goose
Miscellaneous
PostSecretInstapundit
Ace of Spades HQ
Hell in a Handbasket
Brian J. Noggle
1 comment:
This is indeed scary. The solution proposed by some that would provide a printed ballot that would need to be confirmed by the voter would only be a solution if there was a manual recount. What would prevent malicious software from showing the voter one result on the printout (similar to a cash register journal tape) and giving a grand total with a very different result?
Post a Comment