Michael Spencer recently read I'm Okay -- And You're Not by John Shore and reviewed it:
In Shore’s opinion, American evangelicals have saturated our culture with the facts of the Gospel to the point that non-Christians are often filled with astounded dread that we keep telling them Jesus died for their sins and they must believe the Gospel to be saved. If that is the case, then Christians need to stop being annoyingly repetitive communicators (i.e. pressure sales, manipulation, rudeness, etc.) and start showing love, respect, concern, friendship and compassion to the non-Christians (”Normies”) they know.
[snip]
Shore ends each chapter with sets of extended comments from unbelievers on what they want to say to Christians. Shore calls these sections “Ouch,” and that’s what they are. These unbelievers are articulate, thoughtful and way out in front of many Christians on the subject of love, respect and dialog.
Shore appeals to Christians to ponder the nature of love, the importance of honest and mature Christian character and how relationships with non-Christians really look. Shore speaks so much common sense, and skips so much Christian-ese and predictable rhetoric that some Christians will be offended immediately. Younger, thoughtful, humble Christians who know something is very wrong will find Shore saying exactly what they’ve been thinking.
It sounds like an interesting book.
Saturday, March 31, 2007
The Good Stuff, II
I previously listed music from my youth that resonated with me, and still do. Here are a few more:
Torn by Natalie Imbruglia
Unforgiven by Metallica
Unforgiven by Metallica as performed by cello quartet Apocalyptica
I've Been Waiting by Matthew Sweet
When You Really Love a Woman by Bryan Adams
Jeremy by Pearl Jam
I Don't Want to Miss a Thing by Aerosmith
Torn by Natalie Imbruglia
Unforgiven by Metallica
Unforgiven by Metallica as performed by cello quartet Apocalyptica
I've Been Waiting by Matthew Sweet
When You Really Love a Woman by Bryan Adams
Jeremy by Pearl Jam
I Don't Want to Miss a Thing by Aerosmith
Friday, March 30, 2007
Art Blogging: Tim Biskup




Appointing vs. Hiring Pastors
In a recent comment thread, Baptist reader Dan Trabue asked:
You know, there's a lot of things I appreciate about Methodists, but I never did get this whole appointment-of-pastors thing. Is it the case that churches don't have a say, or just not ultimate say on who their pastor is and how long he or she stays?
There are excellent responses to his query in the thread. I don't have time to lay out a complete argument for episcopal church government, but I would like to bring up a few points:
You know, there's a lot of things I appreciate about Methodists, but I never did get this whole appointment-of-pastors thing. Is it the case that churches don't have a say, or just not ultimate say on who their pastor is and how long he or she stays?
There are excellent responses to his query in the thread. I don't have time to lay out a complete argument for episcopal church government, but I would like to bring up a few points:
- Episcopal government (hypothetically) has greater capacity for church discipline. If, for example, a pastor is popular but abusing his office (e.g. theft, immoral behavior) or is teaching false doctrine, then a presiding bishop can yank him out regardless of his local authority. For example, within hours of a UMC pastor getting arrested, the District Superintendent will suspend him from office and have a qualified interim pastor installed until the next appointment cycle.
- Churches that hire the pastor that they want may not get the pastor that they need. Let us say that a local church has greatly bought into consumerist/health & wealth Christianity. If they have the power to choose their pastor, are they likely to hire what they need -- a pastor who will teach against this worldview? No.
- A pastor in an episcopal governing church is not vulnerable to a 51% vote of members to remove him. In a congregational government, the authority in the church is a board of deacons or elders, or 51% of members at a business meeting. In an episcopal government, the pastor is sent to the church representing the authority of the bishop. Although a United Methodist pastor can be driven out of a church if enough members make enough noise, an overnight coup d'etat that leaves the pastor unemployed in the morning cannot happen in the UMC.
- Episcopal government was how the early church, dating back to the Apostolic church, was led.
It is true that denominational authorities can abuse their power. Good ol' boys networks exist in some corners that protect immoral pastors or false teachers from their failure to uphold clergy standards. And congregational church governments have considerable advantages. But whatever system rules a denomination, it will become corrupt unless saturated with humble prayer and led by the Holy Spirit. That is an inevitability.
Labels:
ministry
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Caption Contest

Blogging has been light today, and probably will be tomorrow. I have a big paper to write on narrative Biblical criticism, and it's taking away time from more important things, like blogging and watching Star Trek.
WINNER: Tom Ream:
With her lead foot, lightning quick reflexes, and Interior Castle nobody could touch Sister Teresa at the Avila Carnival.
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Pastors Switching Churches
In the United Methodist Church, it's appointment season -- when episcopal cabinets select who will pastor where. My own pastor has been informed that he will be moved but, quite appropriately, he won't tell us where he's going or who is coming in his place. And hopefully I'll have a student appointment in a few months. On these subjects, Allan Bevere writes about how a pastor should move to a new appointment gracefully:
1. Do not publicly criticize your predecessor. It is unprofessional and no one will be impressed with you. It may indeed be the case that you would do some things differently than she or he did, or you may become convinced that the previous pastor failed in some things, but keep your thoughts to yourself. When you criticize the former pastor your own insecurities will be revealed for all to see.
2. Make sure that you publicly express the appreciation you have for the former pastor. All pastors make some important contributions to the ministry of the church. Do not fail to mention such things when it is appropriate. Such compliments will discourage people from criticizing the former pastor to your face, and those who really appreciate your predecessor's ministry will begin to appreciate your professionalism and your acknowledgement of the importance of the pastor's ministry before you.
3. Continuity of ministry means that while there are things that you will do differently, there are also things that should remain the same. Pastors should not change things for the sake of change. If you change things without prayful consideration or if you change things too quickly, you will send the message to the congregation that the way they have been doing worship and/or ministry is wrong. Make sure that you do not simply brush aside the things they have come to deem as important. At the same time, the church moves forward most effectively when things change. Do not let the status quo who desire that nothing be done differently, hold you captive to moving the mission of the church forward.
Hat tip: MethoBlog
1. Do not publicly criticize your predecessor. It is unprofessional and no one will be impressed with you. It may indeed be the case that you would do some things differently than she or he did, or you may become convinced that the previous pastor failed in some things, but keep your thoughts to yourself. When you criticize the former pastor your own insecurities will be revealed for all to see.
2. Make sure that you publicly express the appreciation you have for the former pastor. All pastors make some important contributions to the ministry of the church. Do not fail to mention such things when it is appropriate. Such compliments will discourage people from criticizing the former pastor to your face, and those who really appreciate your predecessor's ministry will begin to appreciate your professionalism and your acknowledgement of the importance of the pastor's ministry before you.
3. Continuity of ministry means that while there are things that you will do differently, there are also things that should remain the same. Pastors should not change things for the sake of change. If you change things without prayful consideration or if you change things too quickly, you will send the message to the congregation that the way they have been doing worship and/or ministry is wrong. Make sure that you do not simply brush aside the things they have come to deem as important. At the same time, the church moves forward most effectively when things change. Do not let the status quo who desire that nothing be done differently, hold you captive to moving the mission of the church forward.
Hat tip: MethoBlog
Art Blogging: Jim Flora




Church vs. Family
A new study reveals that an increasing number of American Christians see time at church as a competitor with time devoted to the family. It attributes this trend to overcommitment in all spheres of life:
The phenomenon of overprogrammed kids in the last decade or so is well documented—to the point of satire. (A recent sitcom showed an alien begging off an invasion of Earth because his kid had "a thing.") What isn't so well documented is the effect this legion of extracurricular activities has on church life.
The pastors we surveyed report the overall busyness of families is keeping families away from church. Asked whether people are spending more discretionary time on family activities or church commitments, 76 percent said the scale tipped toward family activities. This contrasts with the perception of 62 percent of respondents that a generation ago, free time was more likely spent on church commitments. The balance has shifted.
Carol Welker, children's ministry pastor at First Presbyterian Church in Orlando, Florida, says the impact has been felt especially in weekday programs.
"We stopped doing Wednesday night programs a couple of years ago after they just fell apart," she said. "We did a survey to find out why families stopped coming, and several said, 'That's the one and only night we have together as a family.'"
Al Mohler comments:
When "church time" is seen as a competitor to "family time," something is wrong at church. When family members hardly see each other at church activities, the congregation needs to take a quick inventory of its concept of ministry.
Indeed. As Andy Bryan observed some months ago, it is easy for the Church to become a place of busy-ness instead of Sabbath.
The phenomenon of overprogrammed kids in the last decade or so is well documented—to the point of satire. (A recent sitcom showed an alien begging off an invasion of Earth because his kid had "a thing.") What isn't so well documented is the effect this legion of extracurricular activities has on church life.
The pastors we surveyed report the overall busyness of families is keeping families away from church. Asked whether people are spending more discretionary time on family activities or church commitments, 76 percent said the scale tipped toward family activities. This contrasts with the perception of 62 percent of respondents that a generation ago, free time was more likely spent on church commitments. The balance has shifted.
Carol Welker, children's ministry pastor at First Presbyterian Church in Orlando, Florida, says the impact has been felt especially in weekday programs.
"We stopped doing Wednesday night programs a couple of years ago after they just fell apart," she said. "We did a survey to find out why families stopped coming, and several said, 'That's the one and only night we have together as a family.'"
Al Mohler comments:
When "church time" is seen as a competitor to "family time," something is wrong at church. When family members hardly see each other at church activities, the congregation needs to take a quick inventory of its concept of ministry.
Indeed. As Andy Bryan observed some months ago, it is easy for the Church to become a place of busy-ness instead of Sabbath.
Labels:
ministry
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNERS:
Jeff the Baptist: Santa has started giving the especially naughty children depleted uranium for Christmas.
Quipper: Santa knows where everyone lives, even terrorists. What took the U.S. military so long to figure THAT out?
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Monday, March 26, 2007
The Zombie Within
Gregory Lee extends the metaphor of being 'dead in sin' to being 'undead' in sin':
Finally! This zombie had a name! It was sin! This sin nature that was destroyed by the body and blood of Christ had risen again and continued to live a life of evil within Paul and within us all. This explained it all! In my own Christian walk, I had been attacked on many occasions by zombies. I fought back the best I could, but to no avail. Time and time again, the zombies controlled my actions, forcing me to turn away from God and to give in to the evil that they carried in their bodies. At the time, of course, I didn't know what was going on. I knew that I was a Christian. I knew that I had been washed in the blood of the lamb. I knew that my sins were forgiven. But, yet, that old sin nature, the same one that Paul said had been crucified on the cross with Christ, would come back to life at the most inopportune times, leading me into temptation and sin and evil until I cried out with Paul, "I do not know why I keep doing what I don't want to do!"
Finally! This zombie had a name! It was sin! This sin nature that was destroyed by the body and blood of Christ had risen again and continued to live a life of evil within Paul and within us all. This explained it all! In my own Christian walk, I had been attacked on many occasions by zombies. I fought back the best I could, but to no avail. Time and time again, the zombies controlled my actions, forcing me to turn away from God and to give in to the evil that they carried in their bodies. At the time, of course, I didn't know what was going on. I knew that I was a Christian. I knew that I had been washed in the blood of the lamb. I knew that my sins were forgiven. But, yet, that old sin nature, the same one that Paul said had been crucified on the cross with Christ, would come back to life at the most inopportune times, leading me into temptation and sin and evil until I cried out with Paul, "I do not know why I keep doing what I don't want to do!"
The Psychology of Blogrolling
Michael Spencer looks at how bloggers, particularly Christian bloggers, formulate blogrolls, and offers advice. A good read.
Labels:
blogging
Memorable But Obscure Movie Quotes
Joe Carter has a list of memorable quotations from obscure movies.
It's a good list. One that comes to mind from my memory is from that underrated fantasy movie Krull. Bandit leader Torquil is advised to go on a dangerous adventure. His reward? He'll be famous.
Torquil: Fame? It's an empty purse. Count it, go broke. Eat it, go hungry. Seek it and go mad.
Indeed. What movie quotes are most memorable for you?

Torquil: Fame? It's an empty purse. Count it, go broke. Eat it, go hungry. Seek it and go mad.
Indeed. What movie quotes are most memorable for you?
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Art Blogging: Albin Polasek






Methodist Blogger Profile: Christopher Gudger-Raines

My name is Christopher Gudger-Raines. I am a Licensed Local Pastor of a two-point charge in Morgantown, WV. My wife Meredith also has a two-point charge. We graduated from Drew Theological School in May 2006 and are almost through year #1 of our first appointments. We have no children, but two cats, Daisy and Pippa. Before seminary, I was a US-2, a Time for God worker and a Missionary-in-Residence for Young Adult Programs at the General Board of Global Ministries. I have been blogging since April of 2006.
Why do you blog?
Blogging gives me an audience to whom I am accountable (except no one reads my blog). It helps me stay faithful to regular reflection. Also, as a new pastor, I am learning that communicating my thoughts and beliefs is not as easy as I thought it would be. Blogging helps me articulate what I think, feel and believe.
What has been your best blogging experience?
I love it when my family and close friends comment.
What would be your main advice to a novice blogger?
Uhhh…I am a novice blogger. Otherwise, set a weekly standard (1 blog/week for example). This will keep you faithful. Also, find a niche that will give you something regular to work on (a la Lectionary Haikus).
If you only had time to read three blogs a day, what would they be?
Hillbilly Savants…the best blog on Appalachia…started by my childhood buddy.
We Blog Cartoons…clever, thoughtful, funny, British
Blue Ridge Muse…everyone needs a favorite photography blog to frequent…this is mine.
Who are your spiritual heroes?
Dr. David Deci…creator of MUSHROOM here in Morgantown, WV. He’s a professor here at WVU medical school. The guy is a walking encyclopedia of what he calls “street medicine”. He has traveled extensively studying how to give medicine to the homeless. What strikes me is how effective his kindness is. Ericka Parkinson…an old US-2 friend of mine. She was my first mature example of loving God with heart and mind. To care about something (or someone) and to understand it is a goal that I strive for. I am at my best for Christ when heart and mind are working together. Her influence still sticks with me today. Jeff and David Markay…brother pastors from New Jersey (David is now a missionary in Milan, Italy). I knew them at different times in my life. I love their pastoral presence, their deliberate opting for serenity, their self-differentiation and their calm but provocative preaching styles.
What are you reading at the moment?
My dCOM says that I gotta improve my understanding of atonement. So I’ve got 4 books on the topic, two of which I have begun: If Grace is True: Why God will Save Every Person, by Philip Gulley and James Mulholland; Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross by Hans Boersma. My churches’ Lenten study book is How Good Do We Have to Be? A New Understanding of Guilt and Forgiveness by Harold Kushner.
What is your favorite hymn and why?
Be Thou My Vision…it was in my wedding. It will be in my funeral. As an Irish song, it also belongs in Appalachia, where I belong. One of my goals in life is to be one of those “old men who dream dreams”. It is a hymn of an intimately personal hope, a hope that never dies (“whatever befall…”). I strive to be a light of hope for others, so this hymn fits my life well.
Can you name a major moral, political, or intellectual issue on which you've changed your mind?
Religion in public schools. I changed from no opinion to a strong opinion in favor. It seems a tragedy that so many Americans do not know about others’ religions. I am certain that religion in schools can be taught as an academic subject without watering down the “faith” aspect of religion. I witnessed the thoughtful and beneficial teaching of religion in British schools and know that it can be done here in a way that honors the Constitution and enriches our education.
What philosophical thesis do you think is most important to combat?
Right now, I gotta bone to pick with Original Sin. The notion that we are born sinful or that sex is inherently bad is crazy. I think we have inherited Augustine’s guilt, not Adam’s. The notion that my sins are Adam/Eve’s fault is irresponsible; every time I hear that I see the Church Lady going “The Devil made you do it.”. My sins are no one’s fault but my own. And when my baby comes out (no Mom, we’re not pregnant), you better not call him/her sinful.
If you could effect one major change in the governing of your country, what would it be?
Universal Health Care…I keep wanting to say living wage, but living wage still won’t get you past the ER. It is the government’s responsibility to make available to all the basic elements of life so that the pursuit of happiness can actually be pursued. Gates surrounding health care, especially preventative care, are currently making that pursuit impossible for too many. That the church is largely silent on this is an outrage.
If you could effect one major policy change in the United Methodist Church, what would it be?
I am thinking lately that it is an obstacle for Methodists to own so much property. Perhaps only mission agencies should own buildings. How much of our time is spent administering to buildings and increasing our property (prayer of jabez be damned)? Have they become an albatross around our necks? I hear time and again about young pastors who are ready to turn this world upside-down for Christ, living-water-style, who are choked to spiritual death by all the administrative crap that eats at our time. It pains me that a goal of many pastors (me included) is to find a “healthy balance” between administration and ministry. Does this balance honor the spirit that has been entrusted to us as the church? Or does it keep us from kicking the world’s butt-living water style-like we used to do? Sell the buildings. Imagine how prophetic it would be, in this age of mega-church addiction, to sell the buildings and recommit to something more basic and organic. Methodism again becomes a movement, about bringing a full salvation to the entire world. It is clubs and classes, out of the walls and in the streets, the hospitals, the orphanages and the prisons. That’s a church with guts, with no mission statements, but mission strategies…schemes that make right what is wrong in our world. Cut the cord UMC. Cut the cord and remember what is like to be on the frontiers of faith with a gospel that matters.
What would be your most important piece of advice about life?
Find out first-hand what Jesus appreciated about the throw-aways of society. Get involved in direct service to the less fortunate. Some of the best theologians I have ever met are in homeless shelters and children’s homes. This population of society is refreshing, marked by honesty that is both brutal and astonishingly beautiful.
What, if anything, do you worry about?
I worry about losing the ambition I have as a young person. I thoroughly fear becoming a pastor who has become so inundated with the church that he has lost his zeal for Christ.
If you were to relive your life to this point, is there anything that you'd do differently?
I would probably pursue music as a career. And in my difficulties with getting ordained, I still ponder the possibility. I am at my most joyous when I am playing music and feel like people can’t know me until we share some common tunes. In my spirit is a constantly playing jukebox of tunes…a 10-gig ipod on constant random shuffle. My wife says I am the only person she knows with a discriminating taste in music who isn’t also a music-snob-dweeb. I like that compliment and try to live up to it.
Where would you most like to live (other than where you do now)?
I used to live in Cambridge, UK. That has been the best place I have ever lived (which includes NYC). I would return there in a heartbeat. I loved the healthy lifestyle, the cycling culture, the greens where soccer was invented, the punting on the Cam, the trips to Ely, the constant flow of ale and ideas, the buskers, the fact that every corner had a college, a church and a pub.
What do you like doing in your spare time?
I like playing with my cats. I am trying my hand at gardening for the first time. I play guitar. I like my blog, too.
What is your most treasured possession?
My wedding ring.
What talent would you most like to have?
I want to learn to make stained glass windows. I also wish I was a more competent swimmer.
If you could have any three guests, past or present to dinner, who would they be?
I would answer with family, but only 3 guests would force me to leave someone out. Therefore, I will stick with those famous people who would interest both me and my wife.
1. Ann Curry, the most underappreciated journalist going I would ask her “Why do you keep going back to Darfur?”;
2. Arius; I would ask “What is the meaning of Communion?”;
3. Parker Palmer; I would ask “How can I get the most good out of the gifts God has given me?”.
Labels:
MBP
Saturday, March 24, 2007
The Zombie Episode of The Smurfs

This is one of my favorite episodes: when the Smurfs must struggle against an outbreak of zombieism in the village and fight for their very existence.
Labels:
zombies
Caption Contest

WINNER: John Battern:
The Message's, paraphrase of the Balaam & his donkey loses something in the translation.
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Art Blogging: Henri Rousseau




Labels:
art,
Post-Impressionism
Friday, March 23, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNERS:
Quotidian Grace: Return To Sender.
Tom Jackson: Faced with new evidence of the nature of God, thousands turn to atheism.
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
The Good Stuff - A Bit Farther Back
I listed music videos from some of my youth in the previous post, and some of you objected to my suggestion that these were classic works from the past:
Willie Deuel:
That's the music of your youth?!? Dang I'm getting old.
Vicki:
Ditto Will. Gee. I did NOT need a reminder today of just how old I'm getting...thanks a heap, John.
Okay, we can go back in time a bit more to celebrate the music of their youth, and other readers:
Willie Deuel and Theresa Coleman have done their own compliations.
Willie Deuel:
That's the music of your youth?!? Dang I'm getting old.
Vicki:
Ditto Will. Gee. I did NOT need a reminder today of just how old I'm getting...thanks a heap, John.
Okay, we can go back in time a bit more to celebrate the music of their youth, and other readers:
Willie Deuel and Theresa Coleman have done their own compliations.
The Good Stuff
My wife and I were talking last night about the music of our youth. It's time for a flashback to old days when they really knew how to make music:
Foolish Games by Jewel
Stay by Lisa Loeb
One Headlight by the Wallflowers
Crash Into Me by the Dave Matthews Band
As I Lay Me Down by Sophie Hawkins [embed unavailable]
The Freshmen by Verve Pipe [a fanvid, not original video]
Groove Is In The Heart by Dee Lite
Foolish Games by Jewel
Stay by Lisa Loeb
One Headlight by the Wallflowers
Crash Into Me by the Dave Matthews Band
As I Lay Me Down by Sophie Hawkins [embed unavailable]
The Freshmen by Verve Pipe [a fanvid, not original video]
Groove Is In The Heart by Dee Lite
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNER:
Mark Winter: Batman had defeated the Joker, Penguin and Riddler...but he couldn't thwart the Freedom of Information Act.
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Art Blogging: Shag




Wednesday, March 21, 2007
The Virgin Birth, Prophecy, the Resurrection: Talking Past Each Other
We've had lively debates here at Locusts & Honey on the doctrine of the Virgin Birth and the meaning of prophecy. And now there's a new one at the MethoBlog right now about whether or not the Resurrection of Jesus happened, and does it matter if it didn't happen. If you've been reading me for a while, you can probably guess that I answer 'yes' to both issues.
In these debates, there seems to be an overall pattern. We talk past each other because we disagree on one fundamental presupposition: the inspiration of Scripture. I assume that the Bible is an accurate account of God's Word and my debating opponents assume it to be essentially a human work of no particular authority.
The prophecy debate was over whether a person, lacking mystical experiences of revelation by God, could claim to be a prophet. I looked at the Biblical portrait of the office of prophet and said 'no'. The general argument of my opponents was (my summary) "Well, I feel that I can be a prophet if I search the Scriptures and learn Biblical principles and apply them to today. It's not like the prophets actually had mystical experiences. That was only added later by mythologizing Biblical writers."
The Virgin Birth debate was of course about whether or not Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant with Jesus. I looked at what the Bible had to say on the matter and concluded 'yes'. Again, my opponents saw these passages as irrelevant attempts to mythologize the normal conception of Jesus by a human biological father.
Now over at The MethoBlog, I argue that the Resurrection of Jesus really did happen, again by showing Biblical passages about the life of Jesus which of course depict Jesus rising from the grave and appearing before his disciples --- even eating in front of them. Responses include notions that Jesus later died instead of ascending, or that the bones left his body when he was Resurrected and only his flesh moved about, or that he simply appeared in the minds of his disciples. All of these responses ignore the quite straight-forward Biblical narratives and the direct teachings of the Apostolic writers.
Essentially, we're talking past each other. To support my positions, I'm appealing to Scripture, presupposing that it is truthful document. My opponents are immune to such arguments because they lack that presupposition. I might as well be appealing to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy or The New York Times.
And that's where the argument breaks down and progress stops. And again, I'm left quite perplexed.
UPDATE: I would like to highlight two excellent comments by Tim. Tim correctly points out something that I've wondered about. If one believes in (1) God, (2) the Bible, and (3) the supernatual, then why would anyone doubt the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, or the various miracle stories of the Bible? What possible reason is there. Well, Tim, the reason why they don't believe in these events is...no, I'd better not say it.
Other bloggers have picked up this subject, including Art Ruch, Allan Bevere, Willie Deuel, and Theresa Coleman. There may be some others, but that's all that I can find right now.
In these debates, there seems to be an overall pattern. We talk past each other because we disagree on one fundamental presupposition: the inspiration of Scripture. I assume that the Bible is an accurate account of God's Word and my debating opponents assume it to be essentially a human work of no particular authority.
The prophecy debate was over whether a person, lacking mystical experiences of revelation by God, could claim to be a prophet. I looked at the Biblical portrait of the office of prophet and said 'no'. The general argument of my opponents was (my summary) "Well, I feel that I can be a prophet if I search the Scriptures and learn Biblical principles and apply them to today. It's not like the prophets actually had mystical experiences. That was only added later by mythologizing Biblical writers."
The Virgin Birth debate was of course about whether or not Mary was a virgin when she became pregnant with Jesus. I looked at what the Bible had to say on the matter and concluded 'yes'. Again, my opponents saw these passages as irrelevant attempts to mythologize the normal conception of Jesus by a human biological father.
Now over at The MethoBlog, I argue that the Resurrection of Jesus really did happen, again by showing Biblical passages about the life of Jesus which of course depict Jesus rising from the grave and appearing before his disciples --- even eating in front of them. Responses include notions that Jesus later died instead of ascending, or that the bones left his body when he was Resurrected and only his flesh moved about, or that he simply appeared in the minds of his disciples. All of these responses ignore the quite straight-forward Biblical narratives and the direct teachings of the Apostolic writers.
Essentially, we're talking past each other. To support my positions, I'm appealing to Scripture, presupposing that it is truthful document. My opponents are immune to such arguments because they lack that presupposition. I might as well be appealing to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy or The New York Times.
And that's where the argument breaks down and progress stops. And again, I'm left quite perplexed.
UPDATE: I would like to highlight two excellent comments by Tim. Tim correctly points out something that I've wondered about. If one believes in (1) God, (2) the Bible, and (3) the supernatual, then why would anyone doubt the Virgin Birth, the Resurrection, or the various miracle stories of the Bible? What possible reason is there. Well, Tim, the reason why they don't believe in these events is...no, I'd better not say it.
Other bloggers have picked up this subject, including Art Ruch, Allan Bevere, Willie Deuel, and Theresa Coleman. There may be some others, but that's all that I can find right now.
Are You Hungry, But You Don't Want to Stop Playing With Your Playstation?
Problem solved!

We live in a wonderful world of multitasking. Order yours from PeriBorg.
Hat tip: Engadget

We live in a wonderful world of multitasking. Order yours from PeriBorg.
Hat tip: Engadget
Labels:
geekery
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNERS:
Mark Winter: This cake looks like it's been whipped.
Tom Ream: Just one of the many items that can be purchased at the NOW gift shop.
Willie Deuel: Just find a place and GO already!
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Art Blogging: Paul Landowski

The Sons of Cain (bronze, 1906, Le Jardin de Tuileries).


Monday, March 19, 2007
Israelite Rhapsody
A retelling of the story of David and Goliath to the tune of Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody. Very well made.
Hat tip: Gavin Richardson
Hat tip: Gavin Richardson
Caption Contest

WINNERS:
Gavin Richardson: oh gosh i hope this picture wasn't taken in tennessee. it will set us back 5 years.
Brett Royal: Hopefully is was in the great state of Oklahoma. It would advance us 5 years.
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Emotionally Manipulative God-Talk
David Wayne has quoted a print article by Peter Bloomfield about the prevalence of theologically-laden dialect in the place of normal language:
When the giant has an idea, he never calls it an idea, or plan, or suggestion. No, much too normal, those words." he goes to his "God-Talk" dictionary and uses much holier words and phrases, like "I have a vision", "I have a burden", "The Lord laid it on my heart", "I felt led", "I feel called of God", or the very authoritative "God told me". That man has "words of knowledge". When he describes the nitty-gritty of daily life it is never as normal as 'acting according to Biblical principles': rather it si the highly mysterious "being open to the leading of the Spirit". Though the giant still doesn't know what this means, it hopefully indicates that he "has an anointing", he has the "unction of the Spirit".
I've noticed that the Church can be a place of much emotional manipulation. It can be used to gain power over other people by usurping the authority of God:
Instead of using normal speech to say "there is something I'd like to say", the Giant resorts to 'God-Talk', saying "the Lord laid this on my heart", or "the Lord has placed this burden upon me", or "the Lord gave me this text, this vision, this calling". This is emotional blackmail. Instead of two parties sitting down on equal terms discussing their opinions, we now have class distinction. The ‘God-Talker’ has taken the high spiritual ground and is playing ‘Prophet’. The other (normal) person must sit with baited breath waiting for the pearls of inspired wisdom to drop from the lips of God’s hand picked messenger. Instead of a rational debate where both opinions can be challenged and improved or discarded, we have schism. How can I disagree with any opinion which God has sent? "I felt led" is 'God talk" for "I want to do". "The Lord gave me this text" is a pompous way of saying "a certain Bible truth really struck home to me". "I have a burden" is a pious way of saying "I have a genuine concern". So it is a fair question: can't Christians speak 'normal'? Let's finish as we started with an astute word from C. S. Lewis. "As words become exclusively emotional they cease to be words and therefore cease to perform any strictly linguistic function. They operate as growls or barks or tears . . . They die as words not because there is too much emotion in them but because there is too little - and finaly nothing at all - of anything else".
Emphasis added. As I've written before, don't claim to be a prophet unless you are. I'm thankful that building up an immunity to this kind of mind game has been an essential part of my seminary education. And again, it has been beneficial that I was an atheist into my adulthood because as much as I can understand these phrases, they are not a part of my normal vocabulary.
When the giant has an idea, he never calls it an idea, or plan, or suggestion. No, much too normal, those words." he goes to his "God-Talk" dictionary and uses much holier words and phrases, like "I have a vision", "I have a burden", "The Lord laid it on my heart", "I felt led", "I feel called of God", or the very authoritative "God told me". That man has "words of knowledge". When he describes the nitty-gritty of daily life it is never as normal as 'acting according to Biblical principles': rather it si the highly mysterious "being open to the leading of the Spirit". Though the giant still doesn't know what this means, it hopefully indicates that he "has an anointing", he has the "unction of the Spirit".
I've noticed that the Church can be a place of much emotional manipulation. It can be used to gain power over other people by usurping the authority of God:
Instead of using normal speech to say "there is something I'd like to say", the Giant resorts to 'God-Talk', saying "the Lord laid this on my heart", or "the Lord has placed this burden upon me", or "the Lord gave me this text, this vision, this calling". This is emotional blackmail. Instead of two parties sitting down on equal terms discussing their opinions, we now have class distinction. The ‘God-Talker’ has taken the high spiritual ground and is playing ‘Prophet’. The other (normal) person must sit with baited breath waiting for the pearls of inspired wisdom to drop from the lips of God’s hand picked messenger. Instead of a rational debate where both opinions can be challenged and improved or discarded, we have schism. How can I disagree with any opinion which God has sent? "I felt led" is 'God talk" for "I want to do". "The Lord gave me this text" is a pompous way of saying "a certain Bible truth really struck home to me". "I have a burden" is a pious way of saying "I have a genuine concern". So it is a fair question: can't Christians speak 'normal'? Let's finish as we started with an astute word from C. S. Lewis. "As words become exclusively emotional they cease to be words and therefore cease to perform any strictly linguistic function. They operate as growls or barks or tears . . . They die as words not because there is too much emotion in them but because there is too little - and finaly nothing at all - of anything else".
Emphasis added. As I've written before, don't claim to be a prophet unless you are. I'm thankful that building up an immunity to this kind of mind game has been an essential part of my seminary education. And again, it has been beneficial that I was an atheist into my adulthood because as much as I can understand these phrases, they are not a part of my normal vocabulary.
Labels:
theology
Sunday, March 18, 2007
The Church Has Its Doors Open to Everyone -- Except Convicted Sex Offenders
Remember this United Church of Christ ad?
Ironically, another UCC congregation is struggling to welcome someone: a convicted sex offender:
And that opened a firestorm of emotion, dredging up memories of child abuse from several adult members and creating a debate over safety versus inclusiveness. Suddenly, a liberal, progressive church that prided itself on being welcoming to all people was struggling with what that really meant.
[snip]
Tears welled up as the pastor recounted the conversation. “Nothing in my almost 30 years of ministry has prepared me to turn somebody away,” he said.
When the church's preschool heard about Pliska, both from the service and later from a letter from the church, one of the parents was so outraged that she began a petition drive in protest.
“It's not appropriate to have him there,” said Jessica Muehlhausen of Vista. It doesn't matter to Muehlhausen that the preschool isn't open on Sundays or that her family does not attend the church. What matters to her is the risk.
“Mark Pliska has a right to worship,” she said. “He just needs to find an appropriate church that isn't attached to a children's center.”
Shockley said Pliska has since been evicted from his home and lost his job as a mechanic.
The pastor blames publicity and has stopped using his name. Muehlhausen blames Pliska. “People who commit crimes like this against children have this coming to them,” she said.
Emphasis added. This woman is obviously wrong. The Church cannot deny the Word and the sacraments to any repentant sinner. A colleague of mine at Asbury is associate pastor at a church with a similar member. He has very strict guidelines and when and where he can go and is held accountable for them. It's worked well, although some members of the church would prefer that he drop off the face of the earth.
What about you readers? Have you ever had to deal with issues of safety and welcoming for ex-convicts?
Hat tip: Christianity Today blog. But now I can't find the permalink anymore. Anyway, it was there.
Ironically, another UCC congregation is struggling to welcome someone: a convicted sex offender:
And that opened a firestorm of emotion, dredging up memories of child abuse from several adult members and creating a debate over safety versus inclusiveness. Suddenly, a liberal, progressive church that prided itself on being welcoming to all people was struggling with what that really meant.
[snip]
Tears welled up as the pastor recounted the conversation. “Nothing in my almost 30 years of ministry has prepared me to turn somebody away,” he said.
When the church's preschool heard about Pliska, both from the service and later from a letter from the church, one of the parents was so outraged that she began a petition drive in protest.
“It's not appropriate to have him there,” said Jessica Muehlhausen of Vista. It doesn't matter to Muehlhausen that the preschool isn't open on Sundays or that her family does not attend the church. What matters to her is the risk.
“Mark Pliska has a right to worship,” she said. “He just needs to find an appropriate church that isn't attached to a children's center.”
Shockley said Pliska has since been evicted from his home and lost his job as a mechanic.
The pastor blames publicity and has stopped using his name. Muehlhausen blames Pliska. “People who commit crimes like this against children have this coming to them,” she said.
Emphasis added. This woman is obviously wrong. The Church cannot deny the Word and the sacraments to any repentant sinner. A colleague of mine at Asbury is associate pastor at a church with a similar member. He has very strict guidelines and when and where he can go and is held accountable for them. It's worked well, although some members of the church would prefer that he drop off the face of the earth.
What about you readers? Have you ever had to deal with issues of safety and welcoming for ex-convicts?
Hat tip: Christianity Today blog. But now I can't find the permalink anymore. Anyway, it was there.
Labels:
ecclesiology,
ministry
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Blogging Cat/ Catblogging
I normally find "I had toast for breakfast today" online diaries ghastly tedious, but Tele the Cat has an interesting perspective on life:
So I'm mostly over my fear of any kind of plan by my servants, but I do keep a closer eye on them now.... THis is how my days go:
THe Female servant leaves every day in the morning to get my affairs straightened out and to get me food, I then go to the manslave who is sometimes still asleep and try to use subliminal techniques to make him spill the beans, nothing, they must not have anything planned, I'm still gonna check tomorrow..... Talking about spilling the beans, I need to switch the manservant to dry food, he made big stinky last night that could have choked a cat, wait a minute, it did choke a cat... I'm feeling much better now, though...
So I'm mostly over my fear of any kind of plan by my servants, but I do keep a closer eye on them now.... THis is how my days go:
THe Female servant leaves every day in the morning to get my affairs straightened out and to get me food, I then go to the manslave who is sometimes still asleep and try to use subliminal techniques to make him spill the beans, nothing, they must not have anything planned, I'm still gonna check tomorrow..... Talking about spilling the beans, I need to switch the manservant to dry food, he made big stinky last night that could have choked a cat, wait a minute, it did choke a cat... I'm feeling much better now, though...
Friday, March 16, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNER: Daniel McLain-Hixon:
While the humans continued their going to and fro, oblivious to the growing menace, only the cats stand ready to defend agaist the inevitable squirrel uprising on the local college campus...
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Art Blogging: Jean Dunand




Thursday, March 15, 2007
Just So You Know
By the way -- that I link to a post does not necessarily mean that I agree with its content.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Christians in the US Military
Keith McIlwain pondered Gen. Pace's recent remarks that gays can't serve in the US military because he considers their behavior immoral. Keith wonders why Christians aren't considered morally unfit for military service:
Hauerwas makes a point that is powerful and dripping with truth. Why aren't Christians ostracized by the military? Why doesn't the Army say, "We can't have Christians in our outfit; they won't kill another human being!"
Hauerwas makes a point that is powerful and dripping with truth. Why aren't Christians ostracized by the military? Why doesn't the Army say, "We can't have Christians in our outfit; they won't kill another human being!"
Labels:
Christian ethics
Is Capital Punishment Compatible with Christian Values?
That was my Question of the Day a few weeks ago. Now Josh Tinley has a lengthy post explaining why he answers 'no'.
Labels:
Christian ethics
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Caption Contest

WINNERS:
Andy Bryan: Red, we've been meaning to tell you for some time now.
You're adopted.
Keith McIlwain: You know, they say it's about 1 out of every 10...
Labels:
caption contests,
humor
Political Humor That I Don't Agree With, But Is Still Quite Funny
The new Apple product.
George W. Bush Visits the TeleTubbies.
George W. Bush Visits the TeleTubbies.
Labels:
humor
Art Blogging: René Lalique

Lalique's reputation grew gradually as he was increasingly recognized by art critics as an emerging master craftsman, and Art Nouveau rose in prominence. At the 1900 Paris Universal Exposition, his work was debuted to the entire world, and Lalique's name became famous. He applied glass to different settings, creating the marketing concept of selling perfume in ornate bottles instead of ordinary and designing elaborate glass interiors for luxury trains and ocean liners. In 1925 he designed the pavilion for the 1925 Exposition Internationale des Arts Decoratifs et Industriels Modernes -- the exhibition that coined the term "Art Deco". Lalique continued to produce countless works right up until the closure of his shop after the Fall of France in 1940. He died two days before the end of World War II.



Labels:
art,
Art Deco,
Art Nouveau
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Reaching Out to Klingon Voters

Labels:
geekery
Being In the World, Yet Not of the World

jonathon in our workshops we have done with youth & adults, have brought to light things like the "blasphemy challenge" and other videos and blogs that do not promote the Kingdom of God. we've challenged those folks to treat their time on the internet as part of their spiritual practices and create content that offers alternatives of love and grace where the people are watching and listening. these separate sites, they provide alternatives, but in the world we live in, it is only doing the harm of separating people. if i remember correctly, we harvest the wheat with the weeds, or we loose the wheat...
check it out for yourself and let me know what you think. are we called to be "of the internet" or "in the internet?"
UPDATE: Jeff adds:
The way to be "in the world" but not "of the world" is not to recreate what the world does in a separate Jesus friendly area. That is not "in the world." Being in the world but not of the world means taking Christ to the Christless. It means putting Christian videos up on YouTube, not creating a GodTube just for our own purposes.
Indeed. It also means, among other things, visiting non-Christian blogs and engaging in conversation.
Labels:
Christian ethics,
Internet,
ministry
Relocating a church
My church is facing the possibility of a relocation. The building has some problems related to being built cheaply 45 years ago, but is in a prime spot in a small but growing town. Because of our location, a major retail chain would love to have part of the land. If we sell to them, we would be forced to completely relocate (we don't have enough land to sell and rebuild on what is left).
If there is anyone out there who has taken a congregation through the process of relocation, I'd love to hear about your experiences, especially in terms of how to keep the decision making process a spiritual experience of seeking God's will rather than being driven by the allure of big bucks.
UPDATE BY JOHN: Cross-posted at The MethoBlog.
If there is anyone out there who has taken a congregation through the process of relocation, I'd love to hear about your experiences, especially in terms of how to keep the decision making process a spiritual experience of seeking God's will rather than being driven by the allure of big bucks.
UPDATE BY JOHN: Cross-posted at The MethoBlog.
Was the Destruction of the Death Star an Inside Job?
In our modern age of American hyper-nationalism and emerging fascism, it's not popular to express certain points of view. But some brave investigators are skeptical about claims that the Rebel Alliance was responsible for the destruction of the Death Star. They have questions that must be answered:
1) Why were a handful of rebel fighters able to penetrate the defenses of a battle station that had the capability of destroying an entire planet and the defenses to ward off several fleets of battle ships?
2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?
3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?
4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?
5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?
Hat tip: Garfield Ridge

2) Why did Grand Moff Tarkin refuse to deploy the station’s large fleet of TIE Fighters until it was too late? Was he acting on orders from somebody to not shoot down the rebel attack force? If so, who, and why?
3) Why was the rebel pilot who supposedly destroyed the Death Star reported to be on the Death Star days, maybe hours, prior to its destruction? Why was he allowed to escape, and why were several individuals dressed in Stormtrooper uniforms seen helping him?
4) Why has there not been an investigation into allegations that Darth Vader, the second-ranking member of the Imperial Government, is in fact the father of the pilot who allegedly destroyed the Death Star?
5) Why did Lord Vader decide to break all protocols and personally pilot a lightly armored TIE Fighter? Conveniently, this placed Lord Vader outside of the Death Star when it was destroyed, where he was also conveniently able to escape from a large-sized rebel fleet that had just routed the Imperial forces. Why would Lord Vader, one of the highest ranking members of the Imperial Government, suddenly decide to fly away from the Death Star in the middle of a battle? Did he know something that the rest of the Imperial Navy didn’t?
Hat tip: Garfield Ridge
Simpsons/Lord of the Rings Crossover
Bart and Lisa scam UPS out of thousands of boxes. UPS wants them back.
Labels:
humor
Monday, March 12, 2007
Art Blogging: Edgar Brandt

Deer (bronze, 1920). What Erte did in bronze for people, Brandt did for the animal kingdom.

Like the Art Deco movement, and its preceding Arts and Crafts movement, most of Brandt's bronework was designed to be functional in the home; a sculpture is not simply a slab of metal taking up space, but a useful floor lamp.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)